![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
and then he became a star
First of all I was so disappointed by the whole writing. I felt that they were trying too hard to mix two storylines (the original The Little Prince story) with the original storyline they wrote. It's nice in a sense that they actually tried to keep the source material as close as possible, but it makes me feel that the film lost its focus. I suspect that audience who never read the book before would get confused, especially near the end. Heck, even I found myself wondering when is this movie going to end?
Spoiler from here onwards (includes meta discussion about Antoine de Saint-Exupéry's life):
I was so upset that they made the old man in the movie to be the representation of Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. He was pictures as a loony, weird man who's isolated by his neighbors. Now, I would appreciate this sort of quirky character if he were a standalone. But throughout the film we figured that he was the one who wrote the stories of The Little Prince. The actual person was a sophisticated and refined intellect, who gained fame as an Aviator before his writings added more to it.
Because the old man in the film was pictured as a loner, it also took away the symbolic representation of the rose and the fox (in most analysis, the rose was supposed to be modelled after Antoine de Saint-Exupéry's wife, and the fox was after his intimate friend Silvia Hamilton). I felt that these parts of Antoine de Saint-Exupéry's life were what added a degree of realism to The Little Prince's characters, regardless of the fantasy setting. That also convinced me that afterall, The Little Prince is not just a book for children (there's nothing wrong with children's books when it really is one, though) but a book meant for adults to regain the precious qualities they once had as children. So when they took all of those away, I felt that they had made the story shallower and simpler than how philosophical it should have been.
Plus, the climax? When the Little Prince turned into an adult? I got that they are trying to show and hammer the whole "it's okay to grow up, but remember who you were" theme using that scene, but to me it was not well delivered. Because in the source material, the fact that the Prince "disappeared" (implied to have died)... and then suddenly we have a grown up Prince in this movie.
Spoiler ends here.
I tried so hard to find things I love from this movie, and I did really love the visual style and the amazing score (I bought the soundtrack regardless). I wanted to like it, to be honest, but I found it really hard when the qualities I adore from the source material was buried. Have you watched the movie? What do you think about it? I'd like to hear other opinions on this since most blogs and reviews just praised this movie without discussing the source material.
no subject
I mean they could've just legit made an animation of the actual story, which is what I'd expect going in but chose not to because??? *shrugs*
I'm sorry it was disappointing for you.
no subject
I agree with you. I suppose because it's an adaptation, they kind of have a leeway with how they choose to convey the story? And I think one of the excuses is to make the story more relevant to the current day and age, but I also felt that these stories are classics for a reason? That they are timeless? So why try to fix something that's not broken... right?
By the way, I totally feel you regarding Frozen! It seems like a pattern in the recent movies too... Pretty and nicely packaged, but empty...?
no subject
why try to fix something that's not broken... right?
Exactly.
no subject
no subject
Ah, yes! Looking forward to hearing what you think of it!